Before New Mexico Political Report recently reported on a botched redaction from the state Taxation and Revenue Department, we reached out to its spokesman multiple times.
“Mr. Peters,” he begins in an email sent Thursday late afternoon:
Although taxpayer return information was redacted by the department to provide confidentiality, you purposely manipulated the document (i.e., you were able to get around the redaction and enhance the imagery) in order to reveal taxpayer return information and thwart the purpose of the redaction. Furthermore, you have published taxpayer return information despite the clear intent that it remain confidential. It is unlawful for any person other than the taxpayer to intentionally reveal to any other person the taxpayer’s return information. NMSA 1978, § 7-1-8(A). A “person” means any individual, corporation, company, etc. NMSA 1978, §7-1-3(O). Further, “return information” means a taxpayer’s name. NMSA 1978, §7-1-3(S). This prevents you from revealing a taxpayer’s name, as obtained in this instance.
However, the legible release of the taxpayer’s name in question came from Cloutier himself.
The issue in question concerns an email Cloutier released to media outlets last week related to an ongoing investigation of the Taxation Department Secretary Demesia Padilla.
Padilla is accused of providing preferential treatment to a former client whom she once handled accounting work. Earlier this spring, State Auditor Tim Keller contracted with a forensic auditing firm, Albuquerque-based McHard Accounting Consulting, which conducted a preliminary investigation into the matter.
The allegations against Padilla have since been referred to Attorney General Hector Balderas.
The seriousness of disclosing information of the taxpayer Padilla allegedly protected is peppered throughout public documents concerning the case released by Keller’s office earlier this month.
In one letter, Taxation Department General Counsel Brad Odell writes to State Auditor Chief Legal Counsel Sarita Nair about his concern that, in interviewing department employees, the investigation “will seek disclosure of confidential taxpayer information.”
“Violations of our confidentiality laws place these employees in jeopardy of both employment and criminal sanctions,” Odell writes.
But last week Cloutier sent an email to multiple media outlets between two Taxation Department employees that hint the taxpayer didn’t receive preferential treatment. Although the name of the taxpayer was twice redacted, the redactions were transparent enough to see through on a computer screen. A simple brightening of the email makes the redacted words even more legible.
They botched redactions show that the taxpayer in question is Harold’s Grading & Trucking. In a recent interview, business owner Harold Dominguez denied receiving any special tax treatment.
The fact that a leftwing blogger manipulated the public record to out the small businessman underscores how this has become a pathetic example of manufactured political theater led by the most partisan state auditor in New Mexico history.
Yet Gregory Williams, the president of New Mexico Foundation for Open Government, said government agencies have a responsibility to redact documents properly.
“I don’t think you have a responsibility to return it or something like that,” Williams told New Mexico Political Report in an interview. “I think the responsibility lies with the party that’s producing it.”
Williams added that botched redactions are rare.
“I’m not sure I’ve ever seen it happen where they just didn’t do a very good job with their magic marker,” he said.
In a statement released this week, Keller’s office said it had “been careful not to release information regarding the identity of the taxpayer.”
“It would be deeply troubling if the Taxation and Revenue Department released confidential information about any taxpayer,” State Auditor spokeswoman Justine Freeman said.
Matthew Reichbach contributed to this report.